While reading "Word 2007 crashes are a feature, not a bug" about the failure of Word 2007 to properly exit when attempting to open an improperly formed document, I lamented about the consistent failure of programmers at Microsoft to follow normal programming practices. And then, it struck me! There are no true programmers at Microsoft, only Windows programmers! Thus, the statement Microsoft Programmers must be an oxymoron...
By default a Windows 2003 Server does only allow 2 simultaneous terminal server connections for remote management. "Log Off" closes the Session and releases the connection, but "Disconnecting" such as hitting the "X" to close the Remote Desktop Client leaves your session running and leaves your connection active, so that you can reconnect if your connection information hasn't changed. But what to do if your connection information has changed and you can't reconnect and the second connection is also not available?
In a fit of frustration at the stupidity of the Microsoft DHCP server's user interface limitations, I accused someone who defended it of sounding Microsoftish. Imagine my pleasure at discovering the following definition.
If 'To Microsoft' means to add superfluous features to a product to get people to buy it, then the adjective 'Microsoftish' means 'to adopt the veneer of other peoples' innovations in an effort to improve your own product and eliminate competition.'
However, I would add the secondary definition; "to profess that archaic work-arounds are sufficient to make up for any lack in the design and implementation of your product."